Нещо интересно от седмичния бюлетин
-
- Мнения: 15
- Регистриран на: Съб Апр 08, 2006 10:04 am
- Местоположение: The planet Earth
Нещо интересно от седмичния бюлетин
Здравейте съфорумци.Така като гледам и Канада нещо го закъсва откъм прираст на населението.Ето материала-а коментара е от вас :
Canada faces low birth-rate challenge
02 October 2006
Population census figures this summer combined with immigration and birth rate numbers indicate that Canada can accept a nearly unlimited number of immigrants, given current worldwide migration statistics.
Speaking at a one-day conference last week, historian Ian Dowbiggin, a professor at the University of Prince Edward Island, said the government's top priority should be to introduce financial incentives for people to have children. He cited options ranging from hefty baby bonuses to tax reforms that end the situation where a family with a stay-at-home parent normally pays higher taxes than a double-income family making the same total salary.
The conference was sponsored by the Institute of Marriage and Family in Canada, created early this year as the research arm of Focus on the Family, a lobby group that has, among other things, campaigned against same-sex marriage. His speech was delivered on the heels of fresh warnings from Statistics Canada that the number of deaths in Canada will exceed the number of births by around 2030.
Canada's "birth dearth" (as he called it) promises to pose as many pressing challenges to policy-makers as global warming, and there is no time to waste in taking action to encourage people to have more children. He warned that any foot dragging would take an economic and social toll on the country.
Canadians are only slowly waking up to the policy implications of a birth rate of only 1.5 children for each woman on everything from health care and education to immigration and taxation. Like the debate about how to deal with climate change, however, it is picking up steam, he said.
He argued that immigration alone is unlikely to solve the looming problem of an aging population, especially given the security concerns and anti-immigrant sentiments that have emerged in the post-Sept. 11, 2001, environment.
If current trends continue, there will be more people in Canada in 2017 over the age of 65 than under the age of 15.
"Many experts predict that aging national populations will boost support for the rationing of health care resources and the legalization of euthanasia, either in the form of physician-assisted suicide or voluntary lethal injection," said Mr. Dowbiggin, who is writing Where Have All the Babies Gone, a book exploring the causes and impact of declining birth rates in the world.
Earlier, this week a Statistics Canada report said the rate of natural population increase -- excess of births over deaths -- has stabilized in recent years following a long-term decline, and was at 3.3 per 1,000 over the past year, the decline is projected to resume.
Meanwhile, so far this decade, net immigration has accounted for 60% of the population growth, up from 46.2% a decade earlier, the report said.
Between April 2005 and April 2006, Canada went from a population of 32.2 million to a population of 32.5 million. An extremely aggressive recruitment effort by the government for skilled foreign workers is credited for a large segment of that increase, as well as a very stable and solid economy.
There is still plenty of room in Canada. As the second largest country in the world, just larger than the United States and about half the size of Russia, it has only about one tenth the population of the U.S., which will see its 300 millionth resident by the end of this month.
Canada faces low birth-rate challenge
02 October 2006
Population census figures this summer combined with immigration and birth rate numbers indicate that Canada can accept a nearly unlimited number of immigrants, given current worldwide migration statistics.
Speaking at a one-day conference last week, historian Ian Dowbiggin, a professor at the University of Prince Edward Island, said the government's top priority should be to introduce financial incentives for people to have children. He cited options ranging from hefty baby bonuses to tax reforms that end the situation where a family with a stay-at-home parent normally pays higher taxes than a double-income family making the same total salary.
The conference was sponsored by the Institute of Marriage and Family in Canada, created early this year as the research arm of Focus on the Family, a lobby group that has, among other things, campaigned against same-sex marriage. His speech was delivered on the heels of fresh warnings from Statistics Canada that the number of deaths in Canada will exceed the number of births by around 2030.
Canada's "birth dearth" (as he called it) promises to pose as many pressing challenges to policy-makers as global warming, and there is no time to waste in taking action to encourage people to have more children. He warned that any foot dragging would take an economic and social toll on the country.
Canadians are only slowly waking up to the policy implications of a birth rate of only 1.5 children for each woman on everything from health care and education to immigration and taxation. Like the debate about how to deal with climate change, however, it is picking up steam, he said.
He argued that immigration alone is unlikely to solve the looming problem of an aging population, especially given the security concerns and anti-immigrant sentiments that have emerged in the post-Sept. 11, 2001, environment.
If current trends continue, there will be more people in Canada in 2017 over the age of 65 than under the age of 15.
"Many experts predict that aging national populations will boost support for the rationing of health care resources and the legalization of euthanasia, either in the form of physician-assisted suicide or voluntary lethal injection," said Mr. Dowbiggin, who is writing Where Have All the Babies Gone, a book exploring the causes and impact of declining birth rates in the world.
Earlier, this week a Statistics Canada report said the rate of natural population increase -- excess of births over deaths -- has stabilized in recent years following a long-term decline, and was at 3.3 per 1,000 over the past year, the decline is projected to resume.
Meanwhile, so far this decade, net immigration has accounted for 60% of the population growth, up from 46.2% a decade earlier, the report said.
Between April 2005 and April 2006, Canada went from a population of 32.2 million to a population of 32.5 million. An extremely aggressive recruitment effort by the government for skilled foreign workers is credited for a large segment of that increase, as well as a very stable and solid economy.
There is still plenty of room in Canada. As the second largest country in the world, just larger than the United States and about half the size of Russia, it has only about one tenth the population of the U.S., which will see its 300 millionth resident by the end of this month.
Play or be played
interesno mi e ako niakoi kazhe na interviuto (za sertificata za Quebec)
che vaznameriava da "pravi " deza v Quebec kak shte go poglednat???
Na krivo (ot strah che mozhe da iska pomoshti) ili shtastlivo (che shte
se "vkliuchi" vav vdigneto na prirasta!)
zashtoto nie naistina iskame da si imame oshte edno dete...
(samo deto dosega vse ne beshe podhodiashtia moment
...........)
Da go spomenavame li ???
che vaznameriava da "pravi " deza v Quebec kak shte go poglednat???
Na krivo (ot strah che mozhe da iska pomoshti) ili shtastlivo (che shte
se "vkliuchi" vav vdigneto na prirasta!)

zashtoto nie naistina iskame da si imame oshte edno dete...
(samo deto dosega vse ne beshe podhodiashtia moment

Da go spomenavame li ???
- KolioBalkanski
- Marquis de Suhindol
- Мнения: 9069
- Регистриран на: Пет Авг 29, 2003 8:40 am
- Местоположение: j-cowboyland, Toronto
- Обратна връзка:
проблема е че ако канада продължава така да приема боклуци ще се превърне съвсем в третия сват и няма да има смисъл третосвятците да имигрират тук...
Помогнаха на бай Ганя да смъкне от плещите си агарянския ямурлук, наметна си той една белгийска мантия - и всички рекоха, че бай Ганьо е вече цял европеец.
kato додеш тука ще разберешcanat написа:KAKVO imash predvid "bokluzi" ?KolioBalkanski написа:проблема е че ако канада продължава така да приема боклуци ще се превърне съвсем в третия сват


все пак не е толко лошо положението- от толкоз народ има индййци истински гении, хубави китайки, лесни филипинки и евтини тайландки...
Кир по врат0 е стилът ми, брат0!
Абе хората са си направили труда и са правили изследване, що се не поровите из статистиката
.
Ето нещо за малцинствата с поглед до 2017 (почти 10 години напред) :
2001 - Base population 5,655.9 18.5% 24,960.6 81.5%
2017 - Scenario A 6,987.5 21.1% 26,082.5 78.9%
2017 - Scenario B 7,685.9 22.2% 26,896.3 77.8%
2017 - Scenario C 7,682.5 22.2% 26,891.4 77.8%
2017 - Scenario D 8,383.7 23.0% 28,077.5 77.0%
2017 - Scenario S 9,348 25.6% 27,176.5 74.4%
Първата цифра е броя на имигрантите, втората на родените тук. Погледнете подобните проценти за малцинствата на България или други европейски страни. Ситуацията си е естествена и не е възможно за 20 години да стане толкова бърза демографска промяна освен ако не я подпомогне война или бедствие
.
Ето накратичко:

Ето нещо за малцинствата с поглед до 2017 (почти 10 години напред) :
2001 - Base population 5,655.9 18.5% 24,960.6 81.5%
2017 - Scenario A 6,987.5 21.1% 26,082.5 78.9%
2017 - Scenario B 7,685.9 22.2% 26,896.3 77.8%
2017 - Scenario C 7,682.5 22.2% 26,891.4 77.8%
2017 - Scenario D 8,383.7 23.0% 28,077.5 77.0%
2017 - Scenario S 9,348 25.6% 27,176.5 74.4%
Първата цифра е броя на имигрантите, втората на родените тук. Погледнете подобните проценти за малцинствата на България или други европейски страни. Ситуацията си е естествена и не е възможно за 20 години да стане толкова бърза демографска промяна освен ако не я подпомогне война или бедствие

Ето накратичко:
As was the case in 2001, almost 75% of visible minority persons would be living in one of Canada’s
three largest metropolitan areas — Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal — in 2017.
• In 2017, more than half the population of the Toronto census metropolitan area would belong to a
visible minority group under four of the five scenarios.
• In the reference scenario, more than 1 million people belonging to the South Asian visible minority
group would be living in the Toronto CMA in 2017. In other words, more than half of Canada’s
South Asians (56%) would be living in that CMA in 2017.
• In the Vancouver metropolitan area, the majority of the population would be visible minority persons
in 2017, under three of the five scenarios used for these projections.
• Almost half (47%) of the visible minority population in the Vancouver CMA would belong to the
Chinese group in 2017 under the reference scenario.
• The Montreal census metropolitan area would still be different from Toronto and Vancouver in 2017
because of the high proportion of Blacks (27%) and Arabs (19%) in its visible minority population.
- KolioBalkanski
- Marquis de Suhindol
- Мнения: 9069
- Регистриран на: Пет Авг 29, 2003 8:40 am
- Местоположение: j-cowboyland, Toronto
- Обратна връзка:
да тодото, другия проблем с статистиката е че родените тук (с изкючение на китайците и източно европейците) рядко са с англо-саксонска култура и идеали. а до 2017 ще има още една генерация изсмукана от дъното на световния варел.
Помогнаха на бай Ганя да смъкне от плещите си агарянския ямурлук, наметна си той една белгийска мантия - и всички рекоха, че бай Ганьо е вече цял европеец.
- filipne
- Изгонен от форума
- Мнения: 3360
- Регистриран на: Съб Яну 31, 2004 12:10 am
- Местоположение: Montreal
- Обратна връзка:
Не знам как ще погледнат на това на интервюто, но е публична тайна, че вземат имигранти най-вече заради децата им. Това важи с още по-голяма сила за Кебек.canat написа:interesno mi e ako niakoi kazhe na interviuto (za sertificata za Quebec)
che vaznameriava da "pravi " deza v Quebec kak shte go poglednat???
Na krivo (ot strah che mozhe da iska pomoshti) ili shtastlivo (che shte
se "vkliuchi" vav vdigneto na prirasta!)![]()
zashtoto nie naistina iskame da si imame oshte edno dete...
(samo deto dosega vse ne beshe podhodiashtia moment...........)
Da go spomenavame li ???
и защо е в още по-голяма сила за Кебек, а не и за останалата част от Канада :nenam: Някъде в статистиката пише, че приръста в Кебек е по-отрицателен ли ?
Ние, можещите, водени от незнаещите, вършим невъзможното за кефа на неблагодарните. И сме направили толкова много, с толкова малко, за толкова кратко време, че вече сме се квалифицирали да правим всичко от нищо. (KИ, 1881)