vupros za novata tochkova sistema

Конкретни въпроси и проблеми от житието-битието в останалите провинции (без Квебек)
Заключено
stani
Мнения: 1
Регистриран на: Пет Авг 15, 2003 10:25 am

vupros za novata tochkova sistema

Мнение от stani »

imam li shans, ako subiram 68 tochki po novata tochkova sistema?
Canuck
Непукист
Мнения: 1836
Регистриран на: Съб Юли 26, 2003 2:36 pm
Местоположение: Мадрид

Мнение от Canuck »

Tey ne e nova, my friend, prosto iskat poveche tochki, vmesto 70, 75. shto ne opitash da izmaknesh otnyakade oshte nyakoy druga tochka, ili pak da kandidatstvash za Quebec? :wink: No, ne znam dali shte minesh metara s 68 tochki.
Per aspera ad astra!
Горд канадски гражданин в Мадрид :)
Аватар
Koko
Мнения: 8033
Регистриран на: Съб Юли 26, 2003 2:47 pm

Re: vupros za novata tochkova sistema

Мнение от Koko »

stani написа:imam li shans, ako subiram 68 tochki po novata tochkova sistema?
В точковата система (за съжаление) наистина има промени, ако имаш само 68 точки няма как да прескочиш летвата. Значи или трябва да потърсиш начин да си увеличиш точките до 75, което не лесно или пък да мислиш за процедурата за Квебек.
berti
Мнения: 2
Регистриран на: Пет Авг 15, 2003 10:16 am
Местоположение: bulgarian
Обратна връзка:

Мнение от berti »

Az sum podala april 2000 i neznam s 68 tochki dali imam shans
Аватар
Koko
Мнения: 8033
Регистриран на: Съб Юли 26, 2003 2:47 pm

Мнение от Koko »

berti написа:Az sum podala april 2000 i neznam s 68 tochki dali imam shans
Това е една стара статия от месец Февруари тази година. За съжаление не съм следил развитието след това, но доколкото знам в момента се води дело от над 100 кандидат-имигранти за това подалите по стария закон да бъдат оценявани по старите точки и се чака съдебно решение. Затова май няма и никакво развитие по досиетата подадени по Федералната в Букурещ.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Immigration misled Parliament: court
Alliance calls for minister's resignation after ineptitude affects more than 100,000

Peter O'Neil
Vancouver Sun

Saturday, February 22, 2003

OTTAWA -- Citizenship and Immigration Canada misled and ignored Parliament last year, according to a Federal Court of Canada ruling issued Friday that could affect more than 100,000 prospective immigrants.
The federal ministry was found to have dragged its heels on processing a backlog of immigration applicants desperate to get to Canada before strict new standards were imposed.
Justice Michael Kelen's decision directly affects 102 people who will now have a fresh chance to enter Canada.
But the ruling should force the federal government to open the door to more than 100,000 others who were disadvantaged by CIC's ineptitude, critics said Friday.
"This is a complete betrayal of trust in people whose applications were accepted and who expected to be dealt with by Canada in good faith," said Canadian Alliance immigration critic Diane Ablonczy, who called for Immigration Minister Denis Coderre's resignation.
Vancouver immigration lawyer Richard Kurland said he will launch a lawsuit to either force the government to reconsider all the applicants or pay them a total of at least $100 million in damages.
Coderre announced last year that the government would extend the deadline for the processing of applicants under the old law from Dec. 31, 2002, to March 31, 2003.
The extension followed the recommendation of a parliamentary committee, which said the department didn't have enough time to process all the applicants who had entered the system before tough new standards on education and language proficiency were imposed in legislation announced in December 2001.
But the committee based its recommendation for a three-month extension on the testimony of a senior bureaucrat, CIC assistant deputy minister Joan Atkinson, on March 12, 2002.
Atkinson told MPs that the department anticipated a backlog of 30,000 applicants by Jan. 1, 2003, and she indicated to MPs that the department could find ways to accelerate their processing during that extension period, according to Kelen.
"Based on the evidence before this court, which was subject to cross-examination, it is clear that [the department] provided the committee with significantly incorrect numbers," he wrote.
"Rather than the 30,000 such applications expected to be outstanding as of Dec. 31, 2002, the evidence established that there will be 80,000 to 120,000 such applications expected to be outstanding as of March 31, 2003."
Kelen further wrote that the department "did not inform Parliament of this error when it became evident."
He also wrote that the Immigration Department "ignored" all four recommendations from the committee calling for the department to make efforts to expedite application processing in foreign missions.
The department "ignored the legislative purpose and intent of extending the time frame for assessing such applications, failed to adopt the reasonable advice and recommendations from the parliamentary committee ... and ignored the objective of [the new immigration act] which requires 'prompt processing' of visa applications."
The department also failed to invest more resources despite a $125 million surplus paid by visa applicants during the 2001-02 fiscal year, the judge noted. The department also shut down the Hong Kong visa office for three months last year to train staff "rather than require the staff use their best efforts" to deal with the backlog.
CIC spokeswoman Susan Scarlett would comment only indirectly on the decision.
"We are pleased that the court upheld the validity of our legislation. We are reviewing the decision and its implications for the CIC," she said.
Ablonczy said MPs and Canadians were misled on immigration just as they were on the spiralling costs of the firearms registry.
"Parliament has once again been misled, I think deliberately," she said.
"Either he (Coderre) knew, or if he didn't know, why the hell is he the minister?"
© Copyright 2003 Vancouver Sun
Аватар
Koko
Мнения: 8033
Регистриран на: Съб Юли 26, 2003 2:47 pm

Мнение от Koko »

Koko написа:
berti написа:Az sum podala april 2000 i neznam s 68 tochki dali imam shans
А това е нещо малко по-ново по въпроса

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ ... t/National
Аватар
Koko
Мнения: 8033
Регистриран на: Съб Юли 26, 2003 2:47 pm

Мнение от Koko »

berti написа:Az sum podala april 2000 i neznam s 68 tochki dali imam shans
Ето още нещо по въпроса

http://edng.ca/Lawsuit.htm
Бона
Мнения: 92
Регистриран на: Сря Юли 30, 2003 12:46 am
Местоположение: Отава, Онтарио

Re: vupros za novata tochkova sistema

Мнение от Бона »

stani написа:imam li shans, ako subiram 68 tochki po novata tochkova sistema?
На теория имаш, но не те съветвам да опитваш - имиграционния служител има право да прецени дали точковата система отразява действителната ти адаптивност или не. В тоя смисъл можеш да имаш и повече от 70(75) точки и да не се класираш. НО ТОВА Е НА ТЕОРИЯ. На практика, на фона на тяхната политика да намаляват имиграционния поток , познай кое е по-вероятно ...
Виж там с езиците какво можеш да направиш. Френския може да ти даде до 8 т. Ако почнеш от нулата, мисля че все някак може човек да покрие нивото за beginers и ти да вземеш тия две точки, дето ти са нужни.
Заключено